DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mini Convertible vs 2016 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–71.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeMitsubishi
ConvertibleModelASX
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h—
230 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
192 HPPower150 HP
280 NmTorque197 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
44 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/55 R16 87WTyre size215/65 R16; 215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3850 mmLength4295 mm
1727 mmWidth1770 mm
1415 mmHeight1625 mm
1200 KgWeight1360 Kg
2495 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mini Convertible and 2016 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…