DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Kia KX3 vs 2016 Mini Convertible Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia KX3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.25–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeMini
KX3ModelConvertible
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,2 s
183 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
160 HPPower192 HP
192 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank44 lt
—Urban consumption7,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size195/55 R16 87W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4270 mmLength3850 mm
1780 mmWidth1727 mm
1645 mmHeight1415 mm
1510 KgWeight1200 Kg
2590 mmWheelbase2495 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Kia KX3 and 2016 Mini Convertible approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia KX3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…