DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mini Convertible vs 2016 Kia KX3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia KX3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–71.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeKia
ConvertibleModelKX3
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h—
230 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
192 HPPower160 HP
280 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
44 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,1 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
195/55 R16 87WTyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3850 mmLength4270 mm
1727 mmWidth1780 mm
1415 mmHeight1645 mm
1200 KgWeight1510 Kg
2495 mmWheelbase2590 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mini Convertible and 2016 Kia KX3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia KX3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…