DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mini Convertible vs 2016 Alfa Romeo Giulia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Convertible

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeAlfa Romeo
ConvertibleModelGiulia
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h6,6 s
230 km/hTop speed146 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
192 HPPower200 HP
280 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
44 ltFuel tank58 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears8
195/55 R16 87WTyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3850 mmLength4643 mm
1727 mmWidth1860 mm
1415 mmHeight1436 mm
1200 KgWeight1429 Kg
2495 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mini Convertible and 2016 Alfa Romeo Giulia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Convertible leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…