DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mini Convertible vs 2011 Mini Countryman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Convertible

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeMini
ConvertibleModelCountryman
2010Model year2011
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats4/5
2Doors5

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
182 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
211 HPPower184 HP
260 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank47 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/45 R17 84WTyre size205/55 R17 91V RSC
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3714 mmLength4110 mm
1683 mmWidth1789 mm
1414 mmHeight1561 mm
1230 KgWeight1310 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mini Convertible and 2011 Mini Countryman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Convertible leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…