DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mini Clubman vs 2010 Mini Convertible Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Convertible

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeMini
ClubmanModelConvertible
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

7,5 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
227 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
184 HPPower211 HP
240 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/55 R16 87V RSCTyre size205/45 R17 84W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3958 mmLength3714 mm
1683 mmWidth1683 mm
1432 mmHeight1414 mm
1205 KgWeight1230 Kg
2547 mmWheelbase2467 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mini Clubman and 2010 Mini Convertible approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Convertible leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…