DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mini Convertible vs 2013 Opel Cascada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Convertible

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeOpel
ConvertibleModelCascada
2013Model year2013
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
4Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
225 km/hTop speed212 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
184 HPPower165 HP
240 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank56 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/55 R16 87VTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3729 mmLength4696 mm
1683 mmWidth1839 mm
1414 mmHeight1443 mm
1230 KgWeight1701-1816 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mini Convertible and 2013 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Convertible leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…