DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mini Convertible vs 2013 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.25–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeSuzuki
ConvertibleModelGrand Vitara
2013Model year2013
CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h14,4 s
198 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1586 cc
122 HPPower106 HP
160 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—TransmissionManual
175/65 R15 84HTyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3723 mmLength4005 mm
1683 mmWidth1810 mm
1414 mmHeight1695 mm
1165 KgWeight1370 kg
—Luggage capacity184 lt
2467 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Suzuki Grand VitaraDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsFolding MirrorsXenon HeadlightsSunroof

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mini Convertible and 2013 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…