DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Mini Convertible vs 2009 Citroen C2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Convertible

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeCitroen
ConvertibleModelC2
2009Model year2009
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
2Doors3

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
198 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
120 HPPower122 HP
160 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank41 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
175/65 R15 84HTyre size195/45 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3699 mmLength3666 mm
1683 mmWidth1659 mm
1414 mmHeight1477 mm
1165 KgWeight1084 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2315 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Mini Convertible and 2009 Citroen C2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Convertible leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…