DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mini Convertible vs 2016 Fiat Tipo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Convertible

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

59.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeFiat
ConvertibleModelTipo
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
190 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1198 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
102 HPPower95 HP
180 NmTorque200 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
40 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption4,5 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption3,3 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption3,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
175/65 R15 84HTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3821 mmLength4368 mm
1727 mmWidth1792 mm
1415 mmHeight1495 mm
1130 KgWeight1365 Kg
2495 mmWheelbase2638 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mini Convertible and 2016 Fiat Tipo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Convertible leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…