DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Fiat Tipo vs 2016 Mini Convertible Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Convertible

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeMini
TipoModelConvertible
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
180 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1198 cc
95 HPPower102 HP
200 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank40 lt
4,5 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
3,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
3,7 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size175/65 R15 84H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength3821 mm
1792 mmWidth1727 mm
1495 mmHeight1415 mm
1365 KgWeight1130 Kg
2638 mmWheelbase2495 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Fiat Tipo and 2016 Mini Convertible approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Convertible leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…