2003 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 1.8 (134 Hp) 2003Overall Score63.25/100
2003 Kia Optima vs 2003 MG ZT Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • MG
ZT
MG ZT ZT-T 1.8 i 16V Turbo (160 Hp) 2003Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationMG ZT
KiaMakeMG
OptimaModelZT
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationMG ZT
—0–100 km/h12,2 s
199 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1836 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
134 HPPower160 HP
169 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption11,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
—Average consumption7,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationMG ZT
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size225/45 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationMG ZT
4745 mmLength4790 mm
1815 mmWidth1780 mm
1420 mmHeight1410 mm
1390 KgWeight1505 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2750 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Kia Optima and 2003 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…