DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZT vs 2003 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZTSpecificationBMW Z3
MGMakeBMW
ZTModelZ3
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

MG ZTSpecificationBMW Z3
11,3 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
193 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1951 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
131 HPPower118 HP
300 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZTSpecificationBMW Z3
DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption11 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZTSpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/45 R18Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZTSpecificationBMW Z3
4740 mmLength4050 mm
1780 mmWidth1740 mm
1410 mmHeight1288 mm
1535 KgWeight1220 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZT and 2003 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…