DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 BMW Z3 vs 2003 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationMG ZT
BMWMakeMG
Z3ModelZT
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationMG ZT
10,4 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
196 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1951 cc
118 HPPower131 HP
190 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank65 lt
11 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationMG ZT
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size225/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationMG ZT
4050 mmLength4740 mm
1740 mmWidth1780 mm
1288 mmHeight1410 mm
1220 KgWeight1535 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 BMW Z3 and 2003 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…