DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG ZS vs 2004 Citroen C5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C5
MGMakeCitroen
ZSModelC5
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C5
11,0 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
187 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
101 HPPower136 HP
240 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C5
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank66 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C5
4520 mmLength4618 mm
1700 mmWidth1770 mm
1390 mmHeight1476 mm
1230 KgWeight1318 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG ZS and 2004 Citroen C5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…