DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan AD vs 2004 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationMG ZS
NissanMakeMG
ADModelZS
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationMG ZS
—0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
105 HPPower101 HP
149 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption7,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size205/45 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationMG ZS
4370 mmLength4520 mm
1695 mmWidth1700 mm
1475 mmHeight1390 mm
1130 KgWeight1230 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan AD and 2004 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…