DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG ZS vs 2004 Citroen C4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C4
MGMakeCitroen
ZSModelC4
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C4
11,0 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
187 km/hTop speed207 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
101 HPPower136 HP
240 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C4
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption11,3 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen C4
4520 mmLength4273 mm
1700 mmWidth1769 mm
1390 mmHeight1456 mm
1230 KgWeight1279 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2608 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG ZS and 2004 Citroen C4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…