DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG ZS vs 2004 Skoda Superb Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Superb

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationSkoda Superb
MGMakeSkoda
ZSModelSuperb
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeLiftback
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationSkoda Superb
9,0 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
19 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
117 HPPower115 HP
160 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationSkoda Superb
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank62 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationSkoda Superb
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationSkoda Superb
4520 mmLength4803 mm
1700 mmWidth1765 mm
1390 mmHeight1469 mm
1125 KgWeight1250 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2803 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG ZS and 2004 Skoda Superb approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Superb leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…