DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG ZS vs 2004 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationRenault Scenic
MGMakeRenault
ZSModelScenic
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationRenault Scenic
9,0 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
19 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
117 HPPower115 HP
160 NmTorque152 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationRenault Scenic
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationRenault Scenic
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationRenault Scenic
4520 mmLength4259 mm
1700 mmWidth1810 mm
1390 mmHeight1620 mm
1125 KgWeight—
2620 mmWheelbase2685 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG ZS and 2004 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…