DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG ZS vs 2004 Kia Sportage Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Sportage

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationKia Sportage
MGMakeKia
ZSModelSportage
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationKia Sportage
9,0 s0–100 km/h14,7 s
19 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
117 HPPower128 HP
160 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationKia Sportage
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption15,4 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationKia Sportage
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationKia Sportage
4520 mmLength4025 mm
1700 mmWidth1764 mm
1390 mmHeight1650 mm
1125 KgWeight1453 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG ZS and 2004 Kia Sportage approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Sportage leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…