DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG ZS vs 2004 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationFord Mondeo
MGMakeFord
ZSModelMondeo
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationFord Mondeo
9,0 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
19 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
117 HPPower110 HP
160 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationFord Mondeo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank58 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationFord Mondeo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationFord Mondeo
4520 mmLength4731 mm
1700 mmWidth1812 mm
1390 mmHeight1429 mm
1125 KgWeight1374 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2754 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG ZS and 2004 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…