DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG ZS vs 2004 Daewoo Rezzo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Rezzo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
MGMakeDaewoo
ZSModelRezzo
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
9,0 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
19 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
117 HPPower121 HP
160 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size195/60 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
4520 mmLength4350 mm
1700 mmWidth1755 mm
1390 mmHeight1580 mm
1125 KgWeight1381 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG ZS and 2004 Daewoo Rezzo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Rezzo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…