DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZS vs 2002 Volkswagen Passat Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Passat

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeVolkswagen
ZSModelPassat
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
19 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
117 HPPower115 HP
160 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank62 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption12 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4520 mmLength4683 mm
1700 mmWidth1746 mm
1390 mmHeight1498 mm
1125 KgWeight1395 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2703 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZS and 2002 Volkswagen Passat approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Passat leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…