DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Rover 75 vs 2002 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 75SpecificationMG ZS
RoverMakeMG
75ModelZS
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Rover 75SpecificationMG ZS
11,6 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
195 km/hTop speed19 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
120 HPPower117 HP
160 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 75SpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 75SpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/55 R16 93 WTyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 75SpecificationMG ZS
4747 mmLength4520 mm
1778 mmWidth1700 mm
1424 mmHeight1390 mm
1445 KgWeight1125 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Rover 75 and 2002 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…