DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZS vs 2002 Toyota RAV4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota RAV4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationToyota RAV4
MGMakeToyota
ZSModelRAV4
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationToyota RAV4
9,0 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
19 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
117 HPPower125 HP
160 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationToyota RAV4
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank57 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationToyota RAV4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size215/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationToyota RAV4
4520 mmLength3850-3865 mm
1700 mmWidth1735-1785 mm
1390 mmHeight1655 mm
1125 KgWeight1125-1235 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2280 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZS and 2002 Toyota RAV4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota RAV4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…