DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZS vs 2002 Skoda Octavia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Octavia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationSkoda Octavia
MGMakeSkoda
ZSModelOctavia
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationSkoda Octavia
9,0 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
19 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
117 HPPower115 HP
160 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationSkoda Octavia
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationSkoda Octavia
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationSkoda Octavia
4520 mmLength4513 mm
1700 mmWidth1731 mm
1390 mmHeight1481 mm
1125 KgWeight1450 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2518 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZS and 2002 Skoda Octavia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Octavia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…