DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZS vs 2002 Kia Shuma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Shuma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationKia Shuma
MGMakeKia
ZSModelShuma
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationKia Shuma
9,0 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
19 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1793 cc
117 HPPower114 HP
160 NmTorque152 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationKia Shuma
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption12,2 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationKia Shuma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size195/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationKia Shuma
4520 mmLength4525 mm
1700 mmWidth1720 mm
1390 mmHeight1415 mm
1125 KgWeight1135 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZS and 2002 Kia Shuma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Shuma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…