DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZS vs 2002 Honda CR-V Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationHonda CR-V
MGMakeHonda
ZSModelCR-V
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationHonda CR-V
9,0 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
19 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
117 HPPower147 HP
160 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationHonda CR-V
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank58 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationHonda CR-V
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationHonda CR-V
4520 mmLength4520 mm
1700 mmWidth1750 mm
1390 mmHeight1675 mm
1125 KgWeight1490 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZS and 2002 Honda CR-V approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…