DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZS vs 2002 Ford Escape Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Escape

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationFord Escape
MGMakeFord
ZSModelEscape
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationFord Escape
9,0 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
19 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
117 HPPower129 HP
160 NmTorque183 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationFord Escape
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank58 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationFord Escape
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationFord Escape
4520 mmLength4394 mm
1700 mmWidth1780 mm
1390 mmHeight1702 mm
1125 KgWeight1420 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2619 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZS and 2002 Ford Escape approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Escape leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…