DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZR vs 2002 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationVolvo S40
MGMakeVolvo
ZRModelS40
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationVolvo S40
9,1 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
192 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1783 cc
117 HPPower122 HP
160 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationVolvo S40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size195/55 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationVolvo S40
4011 mmLength4516 mm
1690 mmWidth1716 mm
1400 mmHeight1422 mm
1070 KgWeight1255 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZR and 2002 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…