DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Ford Mondeo vs 2002 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford MondeoSpecificationMG ZR
FordMakeMG
MondeoModelZR
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Ford MondeoSpecificationMG ZR
10,8 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
205 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
125 HPPower117 HP
170 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford MondeoSpecificationMG ZR
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption9,9 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford MondeoSpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

Ford MondeoSpecificationMG ZR
4731 mmLength4011 mm
1812 mmWidth1690 mm
1429 mmHeight1400 mm
1373 KgWeight1070 Kg
2754 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Ford Mondeo and 2002 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…