DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZR vs 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeMitsubishi
ZRModelLancer
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
179 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1584 cc
103 HPPower98 HP
123 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4011 mmLength4485 mm
1690 mmWidth1695 mm
1400 mmHeight1480 mm
1060 KgWeight1360 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZR and 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…