DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZR vs 2003 Fiat Panda Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationFiat Panda
MGMakeFiat
ZRModelPanda
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationFiat Panda
11,0 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
179 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1251 cc
103 HPPower70 HP
123 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationFiat Panda
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank35 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption5,4 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationFiat Panda
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size155/80 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationFiat Panda
4011 mmLength3538 mm
1690 mmWidth1578 mm
1400 mmHeight1540 mm
1060 KgWeight935 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2299 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZR and 2003 Fiat Panda approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…