DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG TF vs 2003 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG TF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG TFSpecificationRenault Scenic
MGMakeRenault
TFModelScenic
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

MG TFSpecificationRenault Scenic
10,2 s0–100 km/h14,5 s
190 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
120 HPPower98 HP
160 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG TFSpecificationRenault Scenic
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG TFSpecificationRenault Scenic
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
185/55 R15; 205/50 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG TFSpecificationRenault Scenic
3943 mmLength4425 mm
1630 mmWidth1775 mm
1261 mmHeight1720 mm
1125 KgWeight1485 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG TF and 2003 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG TF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…