DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG TF vs 2002 Honda Sm-x Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG TF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG TFSpecificationHonda Sm-x
MGMakeHonda
TFModelSm-x
2002Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
2Seats4
2Doors4

Performance

MG TFSpecificationHonda Sm-x
10,2 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
120 HPPower131 HP
160 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG TFSpecificationHonda Sm-x
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption8,93 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,43 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG TFSpecificationHonda Sm-x
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears4
185/55 R15; 205/50 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

MG TFSpecificationHonda Sm-x
3943 mmLength3950 mm
1630 mmWidth1695 mm
1261 mmHeight1750 mm
1125 KgWeight1330 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG TF and 2002 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG TF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…