DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Honda Sm-x vs 2002 MG TF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG TF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda Sm-xSpecificationMG TF
HondaMakeMG
Sm-xModelTF
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

Honda Sm-xSpecificationMG TF
7,2 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
131 HPPower120 HP
186 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda Sm-xSpecificationMG TF
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,93 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
5,43 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
—Average consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda Sm-xSpecificationMG TF
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears—
195/65 R15Tyre size185/55 R15; 205/50 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Honda Sm-xSpecificationMG TF
3950 mmLength3943 mm
1695 mmWidth1630 mm
1750 mmHeight1261 mm
1330 KgWeight1125 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2375 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Honda Sm-x and 2002 MG TF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG TF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…