DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG TF vs 2002 Toyota Vista Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Vista

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG TFSpecificationToyota Vista
MGMakeToyota
TFModelVista
2002Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

MG TFSpecificationToyota Vista
7,6 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
160 HPPower136 HP
174 NmTorque171 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG TFSpecificationToyota Vista
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption11 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG TFSpecificationToyota Vista
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/45 R16; 215/40 R16Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG TFSpecificationToyota Vista
3943 mmLength4670 mm
1630 mmWidth1695 mm
1261 mmHeight1510 mm
1115 KgWeight1210 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG TF and 2002 Toyota Vista approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Vista leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…