DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Subaru Forester vs 2002 MG TF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeMG
ForesterModelTF
2002Model year2002
CrossoverBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

8,4 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
198 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
170 HPPower160 HP
240 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size195/45 R16; 215/40 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4460 mmLength3943 mm
1735 mmWidth1630 mm
1580 mmHeight1261 mm
1445 KgWeight1115 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2375 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Subaru Forester and 2002 MG TF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…