DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG TF vs 2002 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeSubaru
TFModelForester
2002Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeCrossover
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

7,6 s0–100 km/h8,4 s
220 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
160 HPPower170 HP
174 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption12,8 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/45 R16; 215/40 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3943 mmLength4460 mm
1630 mmWidth1735 mm
1261 mmHeight1580 mm
1115 KgWeight1445 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG TF and 2002 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…