DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG TF vs 2002 Honda Orthia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Orthia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG TFSpecificationHonda Orthia
MGMakeHonda
TFModelOrthia
2002Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

MG TFSpecificationHonda Orthia
7,6 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
160 HPPower140 HP
174 NmTorque171 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG TFSpecificationHonda Orthia
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank52 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption11 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG TFSpecificationHonda Orthia
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/45 R16; 215/40 R16Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG TFSpecificationHonda Orthia
3943 mmLength4570 mm
1630 mmWidth1700 mm
1261 mmHeight1490 mm
1115 KgWeight1170 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG TF and 2002 Honda Orthia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Orthia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…