DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 MG MGF vs 1995 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG MGFSpecificationRenault Clio
MGMakeRenault
MGFModelClio
1995Model year1995
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

MG MGFSpecificationRenault Clio
9,0 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
193 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1764 cc
120 HPPower135 HP
160 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG MGFSpecificationRenault Clio
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank43 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG MGFSpecificationRenault Clio
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15; 205/50 R15Tyre size185/55 R15 V
YesABS—

Dimensions

MG MGFSpecificationRenault Clio
3920 mmLength3709 mm
1630 mmWidth1616 mm
1260 mmHeight1395 mm
1060 KgWeight955 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 MG MGF and 1995 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…