DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 MG MG3 vs 2016 Nissan Juke Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG MG3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

52.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG MG3SpecificationNissan Juke
MGMakeNissan
MG3ModelJuke
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

MG MG3SpecificationNissan Juke
10,4 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
108 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
106 HPPower94 HP
137 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG MG3SpecificationNissan Juke
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank46 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG MG3SpecificationNissan Juke
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/75 R14; 195/55 R16Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG MG3SpecificationNissan Juke
4018 mmLength4135 mm
1729 mmWidth1765 mm
1507 mmHeight1565 mm
1125 KgWeight1088-1114 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 MG MG3 and 2016 Nissan Juke approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG MG3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…