2001 • Mercury
Tracer
Mercury Tracer 2.0 (111 Hp) 2001Overall Score63.25/100
2001 Mercury Tracer vs 2001 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2001 • Suzuki
Grand Vitara
Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.0 TD Intercooler (3 dr) 2001Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Mercury Tracer
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
63.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mercury TracerSpecificationSuzuki Grand Vitara
MercuryMakeSuzuki
TracerModelGrand Vitara
2001Model year2001
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats4
4Doors3
Performance
Mercury TracerSpecificationSuzuki Grand Vitara
185 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
111 HPPower92 HP
170 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mercury TracerSpecificationSuzuki Grand Vitara
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank56 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption10 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mercury TracerSpecificationSuzuki Grand Vitara
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mercury TracerSpecificationSuzuki Grand Vitara
4440 mmLength3810 mm
1700 mmWidth1700 mm
1350 mmHeight1690 mm
1115 KgWeight1200 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2001 Mercury Tracer and 2001 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Tracer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…