DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Audi A3 vs 2001 Mercury Tracer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Tracer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

62.25–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMercury
A3ModelTracer
2001Model year2001
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h—
194 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
110 HPPower111 HP
235 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank48 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4152 mmLength4440 mm
1735 mmWidth1700 mm
1427 mmHeight1350 mm
1190 KgWeight1115 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Audi A3 and 2001 Mercury Tracer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Tracer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…