2001 • Mercury
Tracer
Mercury Tracer 2.0 (111 Hp) 2001Overall Score63.25/100
2001 Mercury Tracer vs 2001 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2001 • Suzuki
Grand Vitara
Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.0 HDI (5 dr) 2001Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Mercury Tracer
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mercury TracerSpecificationSuzuki Grand Vitara
MercuryMakeSuzuki
TracerModelGrand Vitara
2001Model year2001
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats—
4Doors—
Performance
Mercury TracerSpecificationSuzuki Grand Vitara
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
111 HPPower109 HP
170 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mercury TracerSpecificationSuzuki Grand Vitara
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mercury TracerSpecificationSuzuki Grand Vitara
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
185/65 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mercury TracerSpecificationSuzuki Grand Vitara
4440 mmLength—
1700 mmWidth—
1350 mmHeight—
1115 KgWeight—
2500 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2001 Mercury Tracer and 2001 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Tracer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…