DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Mercury Tracer vs 2001 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Tracer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeAudi
TracerModelA3
2001Model year2001
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,5 s
185 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
111 HPPower110 HP
170 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4 lt
—Average consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4440 mmLength4152 mm
1700 mmWidth1735 mm
1350 mmHeight1427 mm
1115 KgWeight1190 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Mercury Tracer and 2001 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Tracer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…