2000 • Mercury
Sable
Mercury Sable 3.0 V6 (147 Hp) 2000Overall Score66.25/100
2000 Mercury Sable vs 2000 Ford Taurus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 3.0 V6 (155 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Mercury Sable
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mercury SableSpecificationFord Taurus
MercuryMakeFord
SableModelTaurus
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mercury SableSpecificationFord Taurus
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
147 HPPower155 HP
230 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mercury SableSpecificationFord Taurus
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank68 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mercury SableSpecificationFord Taurus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mercury SableSpecificationFord Taurus
5070 mmLength5019 mm
1850 mmWidth1854 mm
1410 mmHeight1425 mm
1535 KgWeight1521 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2756 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mercury Sable and 2000 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…