DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mercury Mountaineer vs 2000 Lincoln Mark Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Mountaineer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeLincoln
MountaineerModelMark
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
7Seats5
5Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,1 s
180 km/hTop speed200 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement5398 cc
218 HPPower232 HP
391 NmTorque447 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank68 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
11,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/70 R15Tyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4790 mmLength5265 mm
1875 mmWidth1900 mm
1830 mmHeight1360 mm
1800 KgWeight1730 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mercury Mountaineer and 2000 Lincoln Mark approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Mountaineer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…