DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Mercury Mountaineer vs 2002 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Mountaineer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeFord
MountaineerModelMustang
2005Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
7Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
235 HPPower228 HP
395 NmTorque393 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank58 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
13 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/70 R15Tyre size245/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4790 mmLength4635 mm
1875 mmWidth1820 mm
1830 mmHeight1360 mm
—Weight1550 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Mercury Mountaineer and 2002 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Mountaineer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…