DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mercury Mountaineer vs 2005 Mercury Mountaineer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Mountaineer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeMercury
MountaineerModelMountaineer
2004Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
239 HPPower235 HP
380 NmTorque395 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank79 lt
—Urban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
245/70 R16 STyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4844 mmLength4790 mm
1831 mmWidth1875 mm
1806 mmHeight1830 mm
1891 KgWeight—
2880 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mercury Mountaineer and 2005 Mercury Mountaineer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Mountaineer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…